Code testing, and how we compare

Every strength figure on this page is our own engineering calculation. We hold no ICC-ES evaluation report, no Intertek CCRR and no third-party test. Where our own numbers say we do not pass, this page says so. Your building official has the final say.

What the test actually is

The route for a guard system is ICC-ES AC273 — the acceptance criteria an evaluation report is written against. Intertek's CCRR route tests to the same building-code loads. Three tests run on one specimen: two posts at maximum spacing, with every component including the base connection. Each load is held for one minute.

TestLoadApplied wherePass
In-fill125 lbf
2.5 × the 50 lb code load
Over 1 ft² of the infillNo failure, no disengagement, no visible cracks
Uniform125 lbf/ftVertically and outward at 45°As above. Skipped for residential-only recognition
Concentrated500 lbf
2.5 × the 200 lb code load
Twice: midspan of the top rail, and the top of a single postAs above. Deflection recorded at 200 lbf: post h/12, rail h/24 + l/96

It is a physical test, not a calculation, and it does not forbid the steel yielding. It forbids failure. That distinction decides everything below: a material with a wide gap between bending and breaking is forgiving, and one without is not. Q235 steel has 57% of reserve past yield. 6061-T6 aluminium has 8%.

Where our three lines stand

Ratios are our calculated capacity against the 500 lbf demand at the post top. Above 1.00 means the post carries it.

LinePost36″42″Where it stands
ProGuard50 × 50 × 2.7 mm Q2351.050.90Passes at 36″. At 42″ it forms a plastic hinge below the proof load
CoastLine50 × 50 × 2.7 mm 6061-T61.070.92Knife-edge at 36″, and the welded base is the real limit — see below
EdgeLine40 × 40 × 1.35 mm0.35—Decorative, 36″ ground level only. We do not rate it for fall protection and we do not sell it for a balcony

The welded base, stated plainly

On an aluminium post the base plate is welded, and the greatest bending is exactly at that weld. Welding 6061-T6 costs roughly half its strength in the zone beside the weld. On that basis CoastLine's base is its governing limit, not its wall. Makers who pass this test solve it three ways: a thicker wall (Viewrail, 3.81 mm), mechanical screws backing the weld (Westbury), or a heavy plate with a continuous fillet (Trex). Our published specification is changing to match, and until it does we do not claim a pass.

What the market actually holds

Certification is not a marketing word — a report has a number, a scope and an expiry.

MakerReportWhat it actually covers
FortressCCRR-0248Cable, commercial use groups, 93.5″ at 42″ — on a 2″ steel post with a 2.5 mm wall
FeeneyCCRR-057036″ at 6 ft residential; 42″ at 5 ft commercial. Heavy-duty post required for horizontal cable end posts
WestburyCCRR-0530Commercial and Florida high-velocity hurricane zone. Stainless shim plates mandatory under every base
ViewrailESR-4798Residential only. 48″ post spacing for cable. Must be labelled one- and two-family dwellings only
TrexCCRR-020296″ at 42″ residential; commercial only where the supporting structure is separately engineered
VEVOR · Muzata · Gyykzz · CKENoneNo report, and in several cases the listing contradicts itself on grade or wall
CR Fence & RailNone yetCalculated only. This page is the honest version of that

Note what nobody holds: not one certificate in this field covers a commercial cable span at 42″ beyond 5 ft, and the most-cited residential report is explicitly limited to houses. A seller claiming "code compliant" without a number is claiming nothing.

How our posts compare on steel, not on adjectives

PostWallBase plateReport
CR ProGuard2″ square2.7 mm10 mmnone yet
Fortress cable post2″ square2.5 mm6 mmCCRR-0248
Viewrail certified post2″ square3.81 mm—ESR-4798
Zylorix Marine (316)2″ square1.35 mm6 mmnone
Gyykzz2″ square1.0 mm—none

Our wall is twice the thinnest post sold on the same shelf and our base plate is the heaviest in that group. It is still less than the one post in the field that has passed the test.

What we are doing about it

  • Publishing the calculation, including where it fails. Everything above is ours and says so.
  • Changing the specification where our own numbers say to — the ProGuard wall at 42″, and the CoastLine base connection.
  • Mill certificates per batch, which is the first document any evaluation body asks for and which we do not yet hold.
  • Testing residential first — that route skips the uniform-load test, and it is where our numbers already stand up.

We would rather tell you what we have not done than imply we have done it.