Same columns for every tier, guard rail and cable. Our figures are our own engineering calculations — we hold no evaluation report yet, and the code testing page sets out exactly what that means. Competitor figures are what each maker publishes; where a maker publishes nothing, this page says not published rather than guessing.
| CR ProGuard | Fortress Fe26 | Westbury Tuscany | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Post | 2″ square | 2″ square 3″ for commercial | 2½″ square |
| Wall | 2.7 mm at 36″ · 3.15 mm at 42″ | 13 GA panel | 3.05 mm |
| Material | Galvanised steel | Pre-galvanised steel | 6005-T5 aluminium |
| Span | 6 ft | 93.5″ at 42″ | 8 ft at 36″ · 6 ft at 42″ |
| Base plate | 13 mm | not published | ½″ + 6 screws |
| Report | none yet | CCRR-0192 | CCRR-0530 + Florida HVHZ |
| CR ProGuard | Fortress Cable | Feeney DesignRail | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Post | 2″ × 2.7 mm | 2″ × 2.5 mm | 2-3/8″ |
| Top rail | 2×1″ × 3.0 mm | two-piece, 4.1 mm | not published |
| Span | 4 ft | 93.5″ at 42″ commercial | 6 ft at 36″ · 5 ft at 42″ commercial |
| Report | none yet | CCRR-0248 | CCRR-0570 |
| CR CoastLine | Viewrail 2205 | Superior Aluminum | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Post | 2″ × 3.81 mm | 2205 duplex stainless | not published |
| Material | 6061-T6 aluminium | 2205 duplex | Aluminium |
| Finish | AAMA 2605 over e-coat | AAMA 2605 | AAMA 2603 |
| Salt warranty | see below | 10 yr within 5 miles | not published |
| Report | none yet | covers their aluminium line, not 2205 | none found |
| CR CoastLine | Zylorix Marine | Atlantis Rail | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Post | 2″ × 3.81 mm | 2″ × 1.35 mm | Stainless, grade not published |
| Material | 6061-T6 aluminium | T316 stainless | not published |
| Base plate | 13 mm | 6 mm | not published |
| Price | — | $80 | dealer only |
| Report | none yet | none | none found |
Only one real coastal warranty exists in this field — Viewrail's, and it is on a duplex stainless post, not aluminium. Ours has to be written to match what the isolation hardware actually delivers, not what the category implies.
| CR EdgeLine | VEVOR | Gyykzz | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Post | 1.57″ square | 1″ × 2″ | 2″ square |
| Wall | 1.35 mm | 1.5 mm | 1.0 mm |
| Height | 36″ only | 36″ | 36″ |
| Report or load claim | none — and we say so | none | none |
| Price | — | $34–42 | $54 |
| CR EdgeLine | Muzata | CKE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Post | 2″ × 2.7 mm shares the ProGuard post | 2″ square | 2.56″ square |
| Wall | 2.7 mm | not published | not published |
| Material | Galvanised steel | 304 stainless · 6063 aluminium | Aluminium |
| Height | 36″ only | 36″ | 36″ |
| Report or load claim | none | none | “200 lb point load” — self-claimed, no third party |
| Price | — | $80–90 | $73 · $160 complete kit |
A guard rail fails in one of two places: the post bends, or the base tears off the deck. Everything else is trim. So there are only two numbers worth comparing, and most listings publish neither.
A post is a hollow tube. What resists a person falling against it is the thickness of that tube wall — not how wide the post looks. A 2-inch post with a thin wall is a 2-inch post that bends.
Watch for “nominal”. Steel tube is normally sold at a nominal wall and mills are allowed to deliver up to 10% under it, so a post ordered at 2.5 mm can legally arrive at 2.25 mm. Every wall we publish is the ACTUAL delivered thickness, not the number on the order.
The post is welded to a flat steel or aluminium plate, and that plate bolts to your deck. Under load the plate tries to peel up off the surface. A thin plate bends before the post ever does, and no amount of post makes up for it.
| Post | Wall | Base plate | What backs the claim |
|---|---|---|---|
| Our ProGuard (steel) | 2.7 mm actual | 13 mm | Built to clear the certified numbers below |
| Our CoastLine (aluminium) | 3.81 mm | 13 mm | Same wall as the certified aluminium post below |
| Fortress (steel) | 2.5 mm minimum | 6 mm | Intertek CCRR-0248 — commercial |
| Viewrail (aluminium) | 3.81 mm | 9.65 mm | ICC-ES ESR-4798 — residential |
| Trex (aluminium) | 3.18 mm | 12.7 mm | Intertek CCRR-0202 |
| Budget listings (VEVOR, Muzata, CKE and similar) | often not published — where it is, commonly 1.0–1.5 mm | not published | No report. No test. No published wall. |
That last row is the real comparison. A cheap rail is not cheap because someone found a clever saving — it is cheap because the wall is thinner, the plate is thinner, and nobody has tested it. When a listing does not tell you the wall thickness, that is the answer.
ICC-ES and Intertek reports are not paperwork. The maker hands a finished section to an independent lab, which pushes 500 lb into the top rail and again into the post and holds it, then checks for cracks or anything pulling loose. Passing means a physical assembly survived, not that a calculation said it would.
We are candid about where we stand: we do not yet hold one of these reports. What we do instead is build to more metal than the posts that passed — our steel post carries more section than the commercially certified one, our aluminium post matches the certified one wall for wall, and both sit on a thicker base plate than any product in the table above.